http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/featur ... lum_2.html
Heidi
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:44 am
#48286
i personally find her facial features to be below par to pose in SI, but she is an athlete of some way
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/featur ... lum_2.html
Heidi
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/featur ... lum_2.html
Heidi
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:50 am
#48288
Bah Danica's hot in my books, a woman doesn't have to be perfect in every way body wise to be hot in my books, hell this woman would drive circles around you before you knew whats happened, you'd probably pass out only to wake up surrounded by a cloud of tire smoke only to ask "... did i just get laid" 
Remember when Civics were cool ? Yea me neither
Remember when Civics were cool ? Yea me neither
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:48 am
#48295
nah, i meant in her face
shes got a smokin lil body, its just her face
shes got a smokin lil body, its just her face
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:28 pm
#48346
Fugly, but i would still tap it. Heck, i'll tap anything, i've even tapped my cat.
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:32 pm
#48353
slap a crooked nose, witch hat and a giant mole and youve got the wicked witch
seriously, shes not bad, her body is banging
but id have to tap doggy in order to appreciate danica patrick.
seriously, shes not bad, her body is banging
but id have to tap doggy in order to appreciate danica patrick.
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:34 pm
#48355
ouch... burn... standards high have we?
Remember when Civics were cool ? Yea me neither
DannyCraQ wrote:slap a crooked nose, witch hat and a giant mole and youve got the wicked witch
seriously, shes not bad, her body is banging
but id have to tap doggy in order to appreciate danica patrick.
ouch... burn... standards high have we?
Remember when Civics were cool ? Yea me neither
- Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:48 pm
#48358
no, but when it comes to people on TV being good looking, then i know what i likes, and danica patrick is not one of them.